How do the Sola Scrptura folks react to the Dead Sea Scrolls and other more recent discoveries of ancient Biblical texts not among those canonized by Martin Luther?

However, if one is using the Bible as a premise and traditions, how does one evaluate discrepancies between the two, as traditions are interpretations of Bible passages as their claim for validation.

Since the Bible is a collection of writings (literally what biblia means), you will even find that while Matthew and Luke have genealogies, Paul wrote to Titus and Timothy not to pursue foolish genealogies.

The New Testament was established as part of creating a universal (catholic) interpretation for all Christians.

Top economist who previously sounded the alarm on tariffs sees a possible scenario where Trump 'outsmarted all of us' - Fortune

Just as there are a few discrepancies between the Masoretic and Samaritan Torahs.

In response to A2A:

Even Jesus questioned how the Messiah was David's son.

I listened to Kamala Harris speech she gave in North Carolina. I support 100% of what she said. I am more and more in favor of a Kamala Harris presidency if Biden becomes unable to be our president! Do you find yourself supporting Kamala Harris now?

The influence of the Christian Old Testament was the Septuagint, which predates Jesus. Luther, also maintained the Septuagint philosophy of law, history, poetry and prophets, in ordering, while the Tanakh followed Torah, prophets (Nevi'im) and writings (Ketuvim).

Nuda Scriptira is scripture alone. Sola Scriptura is writings authority over traditions and does not imply Biblical inerrancy (see above in regards to Jesus, and genealogy to David).

If you study, you will find passages in the Orthodox Bible, not in the Catholic.

If my heart stopped beating, would I have enough energy to walk out into the other room 20 ft away before I passed out and died?

Actually, Luther was influenced by the books of the Masoretic Tanakh and did, originally, include the Apocrypha.